- Online Watchers: 11
55" 4K Glasses-Free 3D LCD TV #DigInfo
Video Details
DigInfo TV - http://diginfo.tv 4/10/2011 Toshiba REGZA 55X3 More
Added Oct 11, 2011
Channel Tech
Duration 2:26 | views 45633
Local Comments 0
Youtube Comments 108
Rating:
Tags diginfo diginfo news diginfo tv regza 55x3 toshiba ceatec japan 2011 3d display regza 55x3 4k lcd tv ceatec glasses-free glasses-free 3d
Permalink:
Categories
Twitter Feeds
Flickr
Post a comment
Local Comments (0)
Youtube Comments (108)
james118225 Says:
Soon you will able to Smell the actors Farts
WebVManReturns Says:
I remember when all TVs all had the same resolution and all movies were the same resolution. I kind of miss those days.
3nrasandun Says:
wtf. leave us alone! i just bought a 3D led
shotta2545 Says:
1080p is good, but it's already showing its limits, not in movies so much but in games! . 40-46" and down is ok for 1080p anything above that would be great for 4k .
Borderlands808 Says:
With face tracking, the 3d should b viewable from almost any angle right?? So u don't have to b directly in front to get the effect.
3DFULLHD Says:
nurtester1 , Many guys like you tell this phrase before : " I think Black & White television is enough at home use " I think VHS cassette is enough at home use " I think DVD disc is enough at home use " I think 720p resolution is enough at home use " and now when 4K are out : I think FULLHDis enough at home use " LOL !!! that's so funy !
3DFULLHD Says:
in 1999 a 720x480 pixels 40 inch Plasma cost 25 000 $ us 2D 1936 invented technology , here we have the Future of all today old 2D television with 3840 x 2160 pixels 55 inch Glasses-Free 3Dimensional and 2D LCD TV for less than 8000 $ ! that's not expensive compared to 1999 720x480 pixels 2D 40 inch Plasma for 25 000 $
insanic1 Says:
when lcd and plasma tv were released they cost like 20k here in australia
HappyGuyxlii Says:
With 8k video/television, you don't even need to have those cameras or whatever. It's supposed to be like looking through a window.
nurtester1 Says:
I think FullHD is enough at home for the next ten years. However... film postproduction should increase the resolution... For example IMAX films (70mm) should not be scanned 8K but 12k or even more
vigilantejustice1984 Says:
I don't care what 'experts' say about you won't be able to see any difference. I can tell the difference between a 1920x1080 and 2560x1600 PC monitor, let alone a 55"+ TV. I'm defiantly buying one of these bad boys for my HTPC..
Edsta713TX Says:
A gay gangster?! watch?v=5tYAA285gY0
TheXPrisoner Says:
Thank you for posting in this thread my friend since i cannot comment on that video link you sent, a big fuuck you arsehole, that was not funny. And yeah mess with me more i will fuck you harder.
TheXPrisoner Says:
Thank you for posting in this thread my friend since i cannot comment on that video link you sent, a big fuck you arsehole, that was not funny. And yeah mess with me more i will fuck you harder.
Edsta713TX Says:
Guys, this is how much the TV is going to cost. Confirmed! watch?v=vdpG9lqqxCc
cuddles6938 Says:
4k tvs are ONLY good for 3D movies, they are not worth the money for a regular bluray! You wont notice any difference in quality unless you want a tv 70inches or larger. Save your money, dont bother buying one unless you can afford it, and rather have a tv that will be out of date in a few months, then get a new car, B) Your movies are all in 3D and you dont want to wear awesome Real D glasses like LG tvs require for glasses without batteries tvs (Circular Polarization the same RealD 3D)
PsionNinja Says:
Dear Santa......
0rAlPha0 Says:
$11,580 = (20% ICMS + 60%)*1,8 = 37,520R$
amartinez97 Says:
come on dude its not that expensive when you look in the right places, you could get a new tv or monitor for LESS than $200.
cuddles6938 Says:
4K is good for 3D bout the only thing, otherwise its not worth the money. No content is out at 4K yet. Any screen over 77 inches then 4K is great, otherwise theres no difference watching non 3D content on a regular 1080p screen. Reminds me of the Pioneer Kuro, everyone said it was much nicer and yet it only had a 768p screen, the contrast was awesome.
GamerGuy153 Says:
everything in japan is a little more expensive than the straight conversion so expect the 11,500 dollar conversion to be around 9-10 thousand dollars. Even then though....
Gocast2 Says:
i'd only buy this when it becomes mainstream given that standard 55 inch used to be over 8000$ and now it's only over 1500 :D
ATHENA1231000 Says:
thumbs up for 3d youtube